Neuroradiology In Azerbaijan and The Netherlands: A Healthcare Assessment from The Neurologist’s Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61788/njn.spec.18.9Keywords:
Healthcare Quality Assessment, International Educational Exchange, Neuroradiology, Azerbaijan, the NetherlandsAbstract
Background. Referring physicians are valuable sources of information for radiologist to improve quality in radiology. In different healthcare systems neuroradiology has developed differently. Healthcare in Azerbaijan is developing and investments take place both in infrastructure and knowledge. Tools to compare healthcare in Azerbaijan and western countries can help to guide these improvements by providing detailed information about a specific field resulting in a more focused approach.
Methods. A survey covering the field of neuroradiology was developed, with a variety of items including the availability of equipment, the contentment with the radiological report, the experience of the neurologist, and factors omitting neurological imaging. Data was collected both in Azerbaijan and the Netherlands.
Results. In both countries most neurologist do not receive formal neuroradiology training. The data demonstrate a higher availability of advanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machines in the Netherlands compared with Azerbaijan, and a higher experience with requesting imaging and case reading for the Dutch respondents. The financial situation of the patient can be a reason for Azerbaijan neurologists to omit imaging (due to the establishment of CT and MRI in most cases in specialized and private centers).
Conclusion. The presented survey allows comparison of neuroradiological healthcare between countries in general, and identification of required preconditions to improve collaboration between neurologists and radiologists. A future lower financial threshold for imaging and a future increase in availability of PACS (picture archiving and communication system) will facilitate the improvement of neuroradiological skills of Azerbaijan neurologists. Both Dutch and Azerbaijan neurologists consider weekly clinical neuroradiological conferences together with radiologists useful to improve their skills.
References
McLane HC, Berkowitz AL, Patenaude BN, McKenzie ED, Wolper E, Wahlster S, et al. Availability, accessibility, and affordability of neurodiagnostic tests in 37 countries. Neurology. 2015;85:1614-22.
Shah N. Access to Imaging Technology in the Developing World. Radiol. Glob. Heal. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2014. p. 13-7.
Mollura DJ, Soroosh G, Culp MP, Averill S, Axelrod D, Baheti A, et al. 2016 RAD-AID Conference on International Radiology for Developing Countries: Gaps, Growth, and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2017;14:841-7.
Littenberg B. Technology assessment in medicine. Acad. Med. 1992;67:424-8.
Thornbury JR. Eugene W. Caldwell Lecture. Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. American Public Health Association; 1994;162:1-8.
Sunshine JH, Applegate KE. Technology assessment for radiologists. Radiology. 2004;230:309-14.
Salari H, Ostovar R, Esfandiari A, Keshtkaran A, Akbari Sari A, Yousefi Manesh H, et al. Evidence for Policy Making: Clinical Appropriateness Study of Lumbar Spine MRI Prescriptions Using RAND Appropriateness Method. Int. J. Heal. policy Manag. 2013;1:17-21.
Olthof AW, Zorgdrager AN, Aliyev RR. Radiology review for neurologists. Milli Nevrol. Jurnali. 2014;89-97.
European Society of Radiology. The future role of radiology in healthcare. Insights Imaging. 2010;1:2-11.
Theodorou M, Tsiantou V, Pavlakis A, Maniadakis N, Fragoulakis V, Pavi E, et al. Factors influencing prescribing behaviour of physicians in Greece and Cyprus: results from a questionnaire based survey. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2009;9:150.
Chen W, Chen S, Xiao Q, Wang G, Chen S-D. Current clinical practice for Parkinson’s disease among Chinese physicians, general neurologists and movement disorders specialists: a national survey. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:155.
Balabanova D, Roberts B, Richardson E, Haerpfer C, McKee M. Health care reform in the former Soviet Union: beyond the transition. Health Serv. Res. 2012;47:840-64.
Zhao LB, Miyachi S, Shi H Bin, Suh DC. Comparison of medical education and requirements for training in the interventional neuroradiology in china, Japan and Korea. Neurointervention. 2013;8:3-8.
Ghafoori M, Emami H, Sedaghat A, Ghiasi M, Shakiba M, Alavi M. Quantitative evaluation of Iranian radiology papers and its comparison with selected countries. Iran. J. Radiol. 2014;11:e5050.
European Academy of Neurology. Regional Teaching Courses [Internet]. [cited 2015 May 26]. Available from: https://www.eaneurology.org/Regional-Teaching-Courses.1503.0.html
Branco P, Ayres-Basto M, Portugal P, Ramos I, Seixas D. Brain magnetic resonance imaging: perception and expectations of neurologists, neurosurgeons and psychiatrists. Neuroradiol. J. 2014;27:261-7.
Jackson VP, Cushing T, Abujudeh HH, Borgstede JP, Chin KW, Grimes CK, et al. RADPEER scoring white paper. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. Elsevier; 2009;6:21-5.
Alkasab TK, Harvey HB, Gowda V, Thrall JH, Rosenthal DI, Gazelle GS. Consensus-oriented group peer review: a new process to review radiologist work output. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. Elsevier; 2014;11:131-8.
Lindsay P, Furie KL, Davis SM, Donnan GA, Norrving B. World Stroke Organization global stroke services guidelines and action plan. Int. J. Stroke. 2014;9 Suppl A1:4-13.
He D, Yu H, Chen Y. Equity in the distribution of CT and MRI in China: a panel analysis. Int. J. Equity Health. 2013;12:39.
Bloudek LM, Stokes M, Buse DC, Wilcox TK, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, et al. Cost of healthcare for patients with migraine in five European countries: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). J. Headache Pain. 2012;13:361-78.
Bosmans JML, Peremans L, De Schepper AM, Duyck PO, Parizel PM. How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey. Insights Imaging. Springer; 2011;2:577-84.
Harris OA, Bruce CA, Reid M, Cheeks R, Easley K, Surles MC, et al. Examination of the management of traumatic brain injury in the developing and developed world: focus on resource utilization, protocols, and practices that alter outcome. J. Neurosurg. American Association of Neurological Surgeons; 2008;109:433-8.
Kane B, Luz S, O’Briain DS, McDermott R. Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on workflow in radiology and pathology departments. BMC Med. 2007;5:15.
Bhaludin BN, Shelmerdine SC, Arora S, Senbanjo T, Parthipun A. Delays and errors in abnormal chest radiograph follow-up: a systems approach to promoting patient safety in radiology. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2014;20:453-9.
Fletcher TE, Ali H, Ryall C, Beeching NJ, Joekes E, Lewthwaite P. The benefits of an infectious disease/radiology multidisciplinary team meeting. J. Infect. Elsevier; 2012;65:363-5.
Patterson V, Wootton R. A web-based telemedicine system for low-resource settings 13 years on: insights from referrers and specialists. Glob. Health Action. 2013;6:21465.
Patterson V, Swinfen P, Swinfen R, Azzo E, Taha H, Wootton R. Supporting hospital doctors in the Middle East by email telemedicine: something the industrialized world can do to help. J. Med. Internet Res. 2007;9:e30.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 National Association of Neurologists
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
